Re: Who would you pick at 7? (Includes picks by Mock Drafts)
My money is on a CB if we get stuck at 7.
- Jump to topic
- High Fived 3 times: WolfRaider • raider_kin • TallMarvin
I really want Adams to stick so if I am the braintrust I am involving him as much as possible.RI RAIDER wrote Thu Jan 26, 2023 7:19 am:
No developmental guys (we can not afford a whiff). It will cost us both in terms of not addressing our D and also not appeasing Adams.
WW II did not have trenches that was WW IJeremyturner1976 wrote Thu Jan 19, 2023 3:29 pm:I would take a top tier LB over any position if it came down to need. We need at least two of the best there.
The middle of our field was like the stretch between WWII trenches, no man's land. Kelce ate us alive in particular.
I don’t see that at all. Levis at least has passion and isn’t scared.Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:54 am:No thank you. Everything about Levis screams "A younger Carr."
Been there, done that.
He is a LT by trade and he is undersized there. Why the hell do we need a RT? We clearly need at least one OG. We also have a plethora of needs on defense.rich72 wrote Mon Jan 16, 2023 12:46 am:Peter Skoronski
I was not singling you out at all. Every year before and after the draft we see the same posts of, “Why didn’t we trade back” etc. That’s all I was referring to ;)raider_kin wrote Sat Jan 14, 2023 1:17 pm:I didn't say I was writing it in as a given, just that I hope we can :happy:
Stidham for a year. You just can't solve every problem. The QB class is going to be deep in the first round. We could use a future first to move up of we have to, but we could get our base defensive players this year.
7 is a terrible spot to be in.no one is going to want that unless by a miracle one of the QBs makes it that far.Xramfan wrote Sat Jan 14, 2023 12:17 pm:I love the "snap your fingers and just trade back" option. If it were only that easy.