Return To The RAIDER-FORUM
Say the browns called and offered 1&4 for Mack. Do you take it and what do you do with the picks? I’ll post my response later
Our D would suck, but its sucked for years, even with Khalil Mack.
His thinking was that if they paired Mack with the guy they drafted last year (can’t remember his name) they would be unstoppable on defense and since they have the cap space they could front load Mack’s deal.
I'd take
1. Chubb to replace Mack
4. Ward
10. Edwards
I would take the same players as you
1 - Chubb
4 - Barkley
10 - Ward (would be the "safest" pick among those 3)
Now the #1 pick will surely be a QB
Hypothetical
-
vtraider
Posts: 2,629
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Say the browns called and offered 1&4 for Mack. Do you take it and what do you do with the picks? I’ll post my response later
-
MurdersRow
M&M Boys
Posts: 13,170
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:58 am
Location: Yankee Stadium
- MurdersRow
- M&M Boys
- Posts: 13,170
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:58 am
- Location: Yankee Stadium
- Has liked: 1247 times
- High Fived: 1227 times
-
MurdersRow
M&M Boys
Posts: 13,170
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:58 am
Location: Yankee Stadium
- MurdersRow
- M&M Boys
- Posts: 13,170
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:58 am
- Location: Yankee Stadium
- Has liked: 1247 times
- High Fived: 1227 times
-
Corleone
We owe Murray an apology
Posts: 17,901
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:37 pm
Our D would suck, but its sucked for years, even with Khalil Mack.
-
vtraider
Posts: 2,629
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:32 am
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Similar to my thinking. Trade trade trade. Take buffalo 2 first and patsies 2 firsts.Corleone wrote Wed Apr 11, 2018 2:26 pm:Yeah we’d take that deal, and since we don’t need a QB, we’d trade the #1, take Barkley at 4, and end up with a Jimmy Johnson stockpile of picks.
Our D would suck, but its sucked for years, even with Khalil Mack.
His thinking was that if they paired Mack with the guy they drafted last year (can’t remember his name) they would be unstoppable on defense and since they have the cap space they could front load Mack’s deal.
-
Rodrigo1188
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:32 am
Location: Los Angeles, California
- Rodrigo1188
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:32 am
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Has liked: 2 times
- High Fived: 7 times
I'd take
1. Chubb to replace Mack
4. Ward
10. Edwards
-
chucker
Believer, sort of!
Posts: 9,740
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Location: On my bike
-
FlyBono24
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:49 pm
Absolutely. Shit man I would be ecstatic if the Browns would offer that package for Mack.BoKnows81 wrote Wed Apr 11, 2018 2:54 pm:Interesting. We would have to do it but Chubb would have to be picked #1. I'd take Barkley at 4 and I'd be cool with Smith, Vea or Ward at 10
I would take the same players as you
1 - Chubb
4 - Barkley
10 - Ward (would be the "safest" pick among those 3)
-
FlyBono24
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:49 pm
If they were smart they would've thrown mad cash at Cousins in free agency and then draft Chubb and Barkley.chucker wrote Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:41 pm:I'd probably take that deal but would definitely trade out of #1. Then I'd likely want Chubb more than anything else with the #4 in an effort to replace Mack and find a RB later on. Losing Mack would be a blow and I'd want the best edge prospect in the draft as compensation. I do think the Browns would be crazy to do this though - they simply need to find their future QB and they've passed on too many of them.
Now the #1 pick will surely be a QB