Sir Raider Duck, OMS » Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:33 am
Link, please. The old Hershey bar labels I could find online listed 160 calories for 1.05-ounce bar, not a 1.5-ounce bar. The smaller size results in fewer calories.Ivanavich wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:10 am:+1
1.5 ounce Hersey chocolate bar.
In the 1970s, it had 150 calories listed on the label.
In 2018, it has 220 calories listed on the label.
Raider_Dave » Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:55 am
You talking about Attyla?English_Raider wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:32 am:So any word on whether he’s being banned or not?
This is starting to become a bit frustrating.
Attyla » Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:27 pm
not this time, lol.Raider_Dave wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:55 am:You talking about Attyla?
AutumnWind32 » Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:41 pm
By “this” you mean these off topic ridiculous posts right? I totally agreeEnglish_Raider wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 10:32 am:So any word on whether he’s being banned or not?
This is starting to become a bit frustrating.
vtraider » Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:53 pm
True. My daughter and my sister have Celiac disease. My sister is a 4 in the scale my daughter is a 2. The sensitivity is where people get confused on the rankings and the symptoms.Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:30 am:Yes, but very few people. There is no such thing as "Gluten Sensitivity." You either have Celiac Disease (what the old-timers called "Sprue") or you don't. And if you do have Celiac Disease, you know it.
Sea of Hands » Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:07 pm
OK, Joe Namath.Tape wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:02 pm:He's getting the year hammer....guaranteed.
Attyla » Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:14 pm
this was actually funnySea of Hands wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:07 pm:OK, Joe Namath.
Do you know something we don't? Share if you do...
Tape » Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:16 pm
I know when "no comment" is coming from the camp...it means very bad things.Sea of Hands wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:07 pm:OK, Joe Namath.
Do you know something we don't? Share if you do...
AutumnWind32 » Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:36 pm
Or it could mean there’s nothing to comment on and it’s a league matter which will be sorted out without issueTape wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:16 pm:I know when "no comment" is coming from the camp...it means very bad things.
Same approach with Smith....did we ever see him suit up again??
HITMAN » Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:20 pm
Could it be no comment, because the league hasn't actually said anything on the matter, this entire thing was pure speculation to begin with. I've read two different articles that have suggest it might have stemmed from a failing to take a mandatory test, which is essentially a failed test in the NFL's eyes.Tape wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:16 pm:I know when "no comment" is coming from the camp...it means very bad things.
Same approach with Smith....did we ever see him suit up again??
Judas Fucking Priest, where do you fuckers come from?Tape wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:02 pm:He's getting the year hammer....guaranteed.
NumbersForTheBreak » Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:52 pm
I’ve read along the same lines but some believe it was due to his trade, hence the NFL not dropping the hammer immediatelyHITMAN wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:20 pm:Could it be no comment, because the league hasn't actually said anything on the matter, this entire thing was pure speculation to begin with. I've read two different articles that have suggest it might have stemmed from a failing to take a mandatory test, which is essentially a failed test in the NFL's eyes.
HITMAN » Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:57 pm
I don't think the NFL cares about waiting to dole out suspensions or penalties waiting on trades, Bryant was smart enough to know he was walking a fine line and had to get his shit together.NumbersForTheBreak wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:52 pm:I’ve read along the same lines but some believe it was due to his trade, hence the NFL not dropping the hammer immediately
Sir Raider Duck, OMS » Mon Jun 18, 2018 3:14 pm
Please explain how you came by this information.Tape wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:02 pm:He's getting the year hammer....guaranteed.