Ivanavich » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:12 pm
I bought them and read the label.Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:33 am:Link, please. The old Hershey bar labels I could find online listed 160 calories for 1.05-ounce bar, not a 1.5-ounce bar. The smaller size results in fewer calories.
Attyla » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:15 pm
so your nutbar memory is source material? yea, noIvanavich wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:12 pm:I bought them and read the label.
In 1976 chocolate was very expensive and Hershey's cut the size down to barely more than 1 ounce. And raised the price. That bar had about 110 calories listed on the label. My memory is as flawless as yours.
So... don't coming crying on this board because you couldn't find a link. Another lost argument. You are keeping track, so how many losses does this make?
Attyla » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:17 pm
here you go....wrong again tin hat boyIvanavich wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:12 pm:I bought them and read the label.
In 1976 chocolate was very expensive and Hershey's cut the size down to barely more than 1 ounce. And raised the price. That bar had about 110 calories listed on the label. My memory is as flawless as yours.
So... don't coming crying on this board because you couldn't find a link. Another lost argument. You are keeping track, so how many losses does this make?
Sir Raider Duck, OMS » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:23 pm
To you? Zero. Your usual tactic is to say something stupid then disappear when you're inevitably shot down. But by all means, keep posting. I could use a reliable punching bag.Ivanavich wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:12 pm:You are keeping track, so how many losses does this make?
16 to 88 » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:32 pm
http://www.hersheyarchives.org/exhibits ... ctionId=44rowdyraiders » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:33 pm
It been nearly a week and nothing, im assuming it was all bullshitSir Raider Duck, OMS » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 pm
Ivan thinks "facts" and logic" are commie plots and stuff...16 to 88 wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:32 pm:http://www.hersheyarchives.org/exhibits ... ctionId=44
Here is the actual label per Hershey archives.
From 1973-1976 the bar was 1.4oz with 220 calories.
There are 4 small labels to the right of the big label that will appear. You will need to click on the BOTTOM label and it will bring up the actual label from 73-76. You will then have to click in that picture and it enlarges the label.
For the love of pete people. Do I have to do everything for you?! Took me about a minute. lol...
Attyla » Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:42 pm
https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/i ... ropY2=1791Sir Raider Duck, OMS wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 1:34 pm:Ivan thinks "facts" and logic" are commie plots and stuff...
Hawaiian Raider » Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:20 pm
RaiderCed » Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:44 pm
Well said....the shine is off the hot dog.......ShizoGenie wrote Thu Jun 14, 2018 9:56 pm:Conley injured, Edwards injured, Mack holdout and Bryant maybe out for the year.
Well... Suddenly I'm not so hyped anymore.
SkullCrusher » Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:51 pm
Kid vs Adult maybe? Good to see some solid Hershey talk, was wonderin when we were going to get to it.Xramfan wrote Mon Jun 18, 2018 9:47 pm:Hershey bars tasted awesome in the 70`s. Today they taste like flavorless brown colored wax.
Attyla » Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:14 pm
fuck the hershey bar. snickers kicks hershey bar's assSkullCrusher wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:51 pm:Kid vs Adult maybe? Good to see some solid Hershey talk, was wonderin when we were going to get to it.
Trainnvain » Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:15 pm
You were itching for a trip down the Hershey highway?SkullCrusher wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:51 pm:Kid vs Adult maybe? Good to see some solid Hershey talk, was wonderin when we were going to get to it.
CarrKnight » Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:16 pm
MUH PUTIN!Hawaiian Raider wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 2:20 pm:
LaRaider2010 » Tue Jun 19, 2018 8:51 pm
Not This guy .Trainnvain wrote Tue Jun 19, 2018 4:15 pm:You were itching for a trip down the Hershey highway?