TallMarvin

Posts: 1,557
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:24 pm

• TallMarvin
• Posts: 1,557
• Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 9:24 pm
• Has liked: 656 times
• High Fived: 708 times

  TallMarvin » Sat Nov 26, 2022 6:39 pm

Raidernation1979 wrote Sat Nov 26, 2022 3:40 pm:Yes. I get it. Still a comical thought bad words are more costly than an illegal hit.

Raider727

Posts: 2,510
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
Location: Mystery Babylon

• Raider727
• Posts: 2,510
• Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:40 pm
• Location: Mystery Babylon
• Has liked: 1667 times
• High Fived: 1739 times

  Raider727 » Sat Nov 26, 2022 7:09 pm

Attyla wrote Sat Nov 26, 2022 4:11 pm:it addresses respect for the game. if the players can verbally abuse the refs, it is a small step toward physically. The refs have no armor on their bodies and are not some of the largest most physically powerful people on the planet. Protecting them by creating rules that bear great cost is a correct action. Both sides of the CBA want them protected from harm. I know saying stuff is not physical but you have to draw the line far earlier than hands on.

Sold My Soul

Posts: 9,406
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
Location: In a place you only dream of ....Where your soul is always free

• Sold My Soul
• Posts: 9,406
• Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:08 pm
• Location: In a place you only dream of ....Where your soul is always free
• Has liked: 2314 times
• High Fived: 3859 times

  Sold My Soul » Sat Nov 26, 2022 7:51 pm

Attyla wrote Sat Nov 26, 2022 4:11 pm:it addresses respect for the game. if the players can verbally abuse the refs, it is a small step toward physically. The refs have no armor on their bodies and are not some of the largest most physically powerful people on the planet. Protecting them by creating rules that bear great cost is a correct action. Both sides of the CBA want them protected from harm. I know saying stuff is not physical but you have to draw the line far earlier than hands on.