riseNraid09 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:42 pm
https://heavy.com/sports/las-vegas-raid ... -patriots/BoKnows81 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:48 pm
I would do that in a heartbeat. Two 1sts & Two 2nds? Absolute no brainer. Count me in. I guess my only question would be how Daniels fits in Luke's offense.riseNraid09 wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:42 pm:https://heavy.com/sports/las-vegas-raid ... -patriots/
Article outlines the fact AP has his eye of Jayden Daniels. Bleacher Report pitched a trade in which LV would send the 13th overall pick, the 44th overall pick, a 2025 1st round pick and a 2026 2nd round pick to the Patriots for the 3rd overall pick...
That is a hefty price to pay, yet, its the only way to really trade up and get one of those guys... and given our division, perhaps necessary? It has certainly worked out for Houston... and, I think doing something like this sends a strong message to AP's commitment to molding these team into an AFC West contender.
What do you all think?
riseNraid09 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:54 pm
Im right there with you. I think its vital we trade up for a QB. Staying put at 13 and drafting any of those guys outside of the top 3 simply wont cut it... not when we have to go up against Reid/Mahomes, Harbaugh/Herbert and Sean Payton two times each every season.Goodtimes333 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:16 pm
With his ability to run alone he's proven that he can open consistent run lanes in the ground game with a mobile QB. At the leastBoKnows81 wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:48 pm:I would do that in a heartbeat. Two 1sts & Two 2nds? Absolute no brainer. Count me in. I guess my only question would be how Daniels fits in Luke's offense.
Amused To Death » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:20 pm
Daniels = RG3Hellbound » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:22 pm
Really not even two firsts since you're swapping this years picks. Essentially 1 first and 2 second roundersBoKnows81 wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:48 pm:I would do that in a heartbeat. Two 1sts & Two 2nds? Absolute no brainer. Count me in. I guess my only question would be how Daniels fits in Luke's offense.
WolfRaider » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:25 pm
I would do it and I’ve been anti trade up. The issue is I can’t see it being that cheap. I think it’s another 1st and maybe a 3rd on top of that.riseNraid09 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:27 pm
Hmm. Well, obviously, since ya know... you're the QB whisperer and have a full grasp on what AP's vision is...Amused To Death wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:20 pm:Daniels = RG3
Go ahead and assure another decade of losing
Cue : Bill Callahan
Sir Raider Duck, OMS » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:33 pm
You're claiming Mark will encourage Daniels to play on a seriously injured knee, destroying his career like Dan Snyder did with RGIII?Amused To Death wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:20 pm:Daniels = RG3
Go ahead and assure another decade of losing
Cue : Bill Callahan
WolfRaider » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:42 pm
We did with Crosby last year to be honestSir Raider Duck, OMS wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:33 pm:You're claiming Mark will encourage Daniels to play on a seriously injured knee, destroying his career like Dan Snyder did with RGIII?
If you're NOT claiming that, I'm really not sure what your point is supposed to be.
riseNraid09 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:43 pm
Given, Crosby was rather persistent on playing. That man never wants to be on the sidelines looking on if he doesn't absolutely have to be...WolfRaider wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:42 pm:We did with Crosby last year to be honest
Opoponax50 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:55 pm
Yeah, that scenario seems a little too easy.WolfRaider wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:25 pm:I would do it and I’ve been anti trade up. The issue is I can’t see it being that cheap. I think it’s another 1st and maybe a 3rd on top of that.
If They’re thinking of trading back and not taking a QB, I wonder if they’ll be interested in Jimmy G or anybody else we see as tradable.
raiders93 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 4:17 pm
Yeah that trade cost is incredibly reasonable. I’d think if that’s all it took to move from 13 all the way up to 3… we should absolutely do it. That’s not significantly more expensive than the Davante trade.Opoponax50 wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:55 pm:Yeah, that scenario seems a little too easy.
Also, New England picks 3rd. What if we trade away those picks and Chicago or Washington takes Daniels?
D'oh!!!
chucker » Fri Feb 09, 2024 4:25 pm
I think any discussion of moving into the top 3 would begin with three firsts minimum. I'd make that trade for the pick today even if I didn't want a QB because you could sell the pick for more than that prior to the draft.riseNraid09 » Fri Feb 09, 2024 4:25 pm
That is why you don't make the trade unti New England is on deck to going on the clock... to ensure the payer you are doing all that for is there... D'oh!!!!Opoponax50 wrote Fri Feb 09, 2024 3:55 pm:Yeah, that scenario seems a little too easy.
Also, New England picks 3rd. What if we trade away those picks and Chicago or Washington takes Daniels?
D'oh!!!