- Congrats: 2 These Raider Fans gave raidersince63 high fives (total 2):
- Willmark • Dr Death
-
Be_Easy_25 » Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:03 am
Anybody interested in trading for him?raidersince63 » Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:07 am
I could see Garrett going to the Commanders.Dr Death » Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:44 pm
No. Great player.... maybe the best at his position. We don't need him at this time. We need "other things" at this time.Be_Easy_25 wrote Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:03 am:Anybody interested in trading for him?
Or maybe Detroit.raidersince63 wrote Wed Feb 05, 2025 6:07 am:I could see Garrett going to the Commanders.
heavyD » Wed Feb 05, 2025 1:59 pm
The Raiders are paying Wilkins $84 million guaranteed and Crosby wants a new contract. Garrett will likely want to renegotiate his contract with the team trading for him and then there’s the 1st round picks the Raiders would have to give up. Oh and the Raiders don’t even have a starting QB. It’s just not a good fit for either party.SkullCrusher » Wed Feb 05, 2025 2:11 pm
The Washington Football Team is a good place for him and they have the money to.RaiderLifer » Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:14 am
The raiders have too many high priority holes to fill. They can’t just throw draft picks at a single player. If the team was set at the other critical positions and just needed one elite pass rusher to become a Super Bowl contender then sure. But right now they desperately need a functioning Oline, a lead RB and a high quality QB. None of which they have now. Improving the offense will be its nature improve the defense.HesterLayes » Mon Feb 10, 2025 3:07 am
if Myles was a few years younger i would 100%.Be_Easy_25 » Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:20 am
I think Myles has 5 years in him. He’s not a normal athlete. If he declines, he’s declining from a 99 athleticism to a 95.raidersince63 » Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:36 am
I agree...if we do decide to keep Max, teams will do what they've been doing which is to double team him much of the time...putting Myles Garrett on the opposite side of the would negate that strategy.Be_Easy_25 wrote Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:20 am:I think Myles has 5 years in him. He’s not a normal athlete. If he declines, he’s declining from a 99 athleticism to a 95.
He’s asking out, so I am wondering what it does for his price tag.
17, 16, 16, 17….those are his last 4 seasons games played,
If it’s a Mack package? Pass. We do need the picks to fill our roster.
If it’s A pick? I’m intrigued.
chucker » Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:45 am
The Eagles definitely raised Garrett's value in trade and salary yesterday. There will be teams that suddenly decide that just outscoring the Chiefs isn't the only way. You'd better also have some good coverage guys too, if you're planning to smother the Chiefs like the Eagles did though.RI RAIDER » Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:58 am
The recipe for beating Mahomes has been out there. If you get a good and consistent rush from your front 4 (not from blitzes), have speed in the middle of your D, and good coverage, he is beatable. Unfortunately, it is easier said then done. PM really did not have a typical season because D's are getting a little smarter. KC has been taking away from their D (not resigning or trading players) to feed their offense. They have been lucky to get away with it because their D is still very good. I am not saying this because the Eagles dominated them, but they do have their warts.Rabid Raider » Mon Feb 10, 2025 6:18 am
Carter's draft stock went up too. You kill the QB you win.ALLRAIDERWORLD21 » Mon Feb 10, 2025 7:28 am
Why not Parsons..younger and may cost less, like just swap picks with Dallas so they can draft Jeanty..RI RAIDER » Mon Feb 10, 2025 7:38 am
I'd rather trade up for Carter.Be_Easy_25 wrote Tue Feb 04, 2025 8:03 am:Anybody interested in trading for him?
Oaktown Superman » Mon Feb 10, 2025 7:44 am
I wouldn’t be surprised to see him go # 1 overall. Climbing from 6 to 1 to draft a DE isn’t ideal. Those types of trades are usually reserved for QB’s. I prefaced that remark with usually.RI RAIDER wrote Mon Feb 10, 2025 7:38 am:I'd rather trade up for Carter.
Parsons will cost a 1 & 2 this year, minimum.ALLRAIDERWORLD21 wrote Mon Feb 10, 2025 7:28 am:Why not Parsons..younger and may cost less, like just swap picks with Dallas so they can draft Jeanty..
https://twitter.com/nfl_dovkleiman/stat ... TmEhVYEpig
heavyD » Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:34 am
The Athletic has a piece where they go back through big name pass rushers and Garrett is exactly at the point (year 9) in his career where production slips. Maybe he’s an outlier but the article has a chart and all but one player declined ant year 9 and it’s pretty steep for most of them.chucker wrote Mon Feb 10, 2025 5:45 am:The Eagles definitely raised Garrett's value in trade and salary yesterday. There will be teams that suddenly decide that just outscoring the Chiefs isn't the only way. You'd better also have some good coverage guys too, if you're planning to smother the Chiefs like the Eagles did though.
Garrett is one of 16 defensive linemen in NFL history with at least four Associated Press first-team All-Pro selections across his fourth through eighth NFL seasons, per Pro Football Reference.
Of those 16, Garrett is among 11 whose Year 8 production — as measured by PFR’s Approximate Value metric — did not fall substantively. Those elite players’ season-level AV in Years 4-8 declined over their ninth through 11th seasons in all but one case (Randy White).