signal » Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:06 pm
It is posted in the training camp thread but hey, its deserving. Here is link to depth chart from Raiders.com:Atlasffa » Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:11 pm
The Mercury News limits the number of clicks you can give them before they ask for $. If you want to read some of their other articles, you might want to access the depth chart at raiders.com.
signal » Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:13 pm
Yes - I just reached my limit at that site. Will have to find other sources for info.Atlasffa wrote Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:11 pm:The Mercury News limits the number of clicks you can give them before they ask for $. If you want to read some of their other articles, you might want to access the depth chart at raiders.com.
Atlasffa » Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:16 pm
So annoying. Sometimes I click on a marginal article not knowing it's a Mercury News and waste one of my "picks."signal wrote Mon Aug 06, 2018 3:13 pm:Yes - I just reached my limit at that site. Will have to find other sources for info.
grosse gurke » Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:09 pm
Well...I was hoping some of the rookie D tackles could take starting spots....cant say Im not a little disappointed the depth chart doesnt reflect that. I guess that is good in a way...but it also says that maybe we were not as bad as I thought at D line. Now im kind of conflicted on how much improvement we will see with the D. I thought for sure we had upgraded a lot on the line....and not just depth.Atlasffa » Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:13 pm
Coaches are improved...grosse gurke wrote Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:09 pm:Well...I was hoping some of the rookie D tackles could take starting spots....cant say Im not a little disappointed the depth chart doesnt reflect that. I guess that is good in a way...but it also says that maybe we were not as bad as I thought at D line. Now im kind of conflicted on how much improvement we will see with the D. I thought for sure we had upgraded a lot on the line....and not just depth.
grosse gurke » Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:18 pm
Very True!Atlasffa wrote Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:13 pm:Coaches are improved...
Hawaiian Raider » Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:19 pm
Cook at #2?signal » Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:57 am
The fact that the two rookies DT were not starters does not concern me. There will be a rotation at DT and think both Hall and Hurst will be used quite a bit when the opposing team is in passing downs. Plus, it makes sense that Jelly starts since he is very good against the run and thus would play first downs. Key will see a lot of playing time also - just not on first downs...but trust me, when opponents are in passing downs ....Key will be on the field. It is only the first depth chart.grosse gurke wrote Mon Aug 06, 2018 5:09 pm:Well...I was hoping some of the rookie D tackles could take starting spots....cant say Im not a little disappointed the depth chart doesnt reflect that. I guess that is good in a way...but it also says that maybe we were not as bad as I thought at D line. Now im kind of conflicted on how much improvement we will see with the D. I thought for sure we had upgraded a lot on the line....and not just depth.
LVRaiderFootball » Tue Aug 07, 2018 11:11 am
I hate the fact that Seth Roberts is even remotely close to being a top 3-4 receiver on this team! Hoping Switzer beats him out.