Return To The RAIDER-FORUM
if you want or don't care to have a situation like LeVeon Bell, where Mack gets the franchise for 2 years and sits out
all of voluntary(mandatory) camps, training camp without being fined and reports a week before the season starts. then I guess Mack has no leverage.
Bettors are making Mack to the Packers the highest likely bet.
Previous
Re: The real "will Mack sign" thread - no CFB discussion
-
32assassin
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 4:09 pm
- 32assassin
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2015 4:09 pm
- Has liked: 13 times
- High Fived: 67 times
My point is that Mack is not a marginal player this gives him leverage to hold out because the team is not going to cut him or trade him similar to a player (like Alexander) they can easily replace.Radman wrote Sun Aug 12, 2018 7:04 pm:At what point have I ever said I didn’t want Mack?
And no, he doesn’t have leverage. His situation is nothing like Vadal’s. Vandal was cut because he was a marginal player. Mack is not cut because he has skill and the team has no desire to lose his services. However, the Raiders have ALL the leverage unless Mack is willing to miss regular season games but even that hurts him likely more than it helps him. The Raiders have the 5th year option plus a couple of franchise tags before Mack has any real leverage.
if you want or don't care to have a situation like LeVeon Bell, where Mack gets the franchise for 2 years and sits out
all of voluntary(mandatory) camps, training camp without being fined and reports a week before the season starts. then I guess Mack has no leverage.
-
Ivanavich
RF's mismatch nightmare
Posts: 4,306
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:43 am
Location: in a place where there are no false starts
Bettors are making Mack to the Packers the highest likely bet.
- Attachments
-
-
HITMAN
MEDIOCRE MOTHERFUCKERS!!!
Posts: 25,964
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 11:06 am
Location: Mount Sinai, One Foot in Hell...
-
beastmode24
Posts: 2,472
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:32 pm
- beastmode24
- Posts: 2,472
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:32 pm
- Has liked: 0 time
- High Fived: 688 times
packers and saints 1st round picks going to be at least in high 20's rangeIvanavich wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:28 am:via packerswire:
Bettors are making Mack to the Packers the highest likely bet.
-
eLX_38
Posts: 1,563
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:04 pm
-
chucker
Believer, sort of!
Posts: 10,932
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am
Location: On my bike
I don't think this guy knows what he's talking about. He keeps talking about the "owner" like it's coming out of Mark's pocket. The team will have operating funds and nothing they've done would indicate that they can't afford some more cash this season - don't forget that they already have to pay Mack $14 million in cash this year so it's not all "new" money. There are also plenty of other ways to guarantee money other than a signing bonus.eLX_38 wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:56 pm:Interesting breakdown of Mack situation...read entire thread https://twitter.com/pillagejust4fun/sta ... 15746?s=19
-
eLX_38
Posts: 1,563
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:04 pm
Sorry, wrong tweeter. This is more of how the money breakdown could work. Yeah, no way Mark is paying .01 of his own money. https://twitter.com/holistic_pickle/sta ... 63905?s=19chucker wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:10 pm:I don't think this guy knows what he's talking about. He keeps talking about the "owner" like it's coming out of Mark's pocket. The team will have operating funds and nothing they've done would indicate that they can't afford some more cash this season - don't forget that they already have to pay Mack $14 million in cash this year so it's not all "new" money. There are also plenty of other ways to guarantee money other than a signing bonus.
-
Jeevo
Posts: 4,152
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
This idea that Mark basically can't get the money is garbage. He owns a controlling share of a 2+ billion dollar asset and a wall of cash flow is coming at him soon. Bankers love shmoozing with sports celebs and the chance of default is zero.chucker wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 5:10 pm:I don't think this guy knows what he's talking about. He keeps talking about the "owner" like it's coming out of Mark's pocket. The team will have operating funds and nothing they've done would indicate that they can't afford some more cash this season - don't forget that they already have to pay Mack $14 million in cash this year so it's not all "new" money. There are also plenty of other ways to guarantee money other than a signing bonus.
-
CarrKnight
Carrsader
Posts: 8,330
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: Trying to find the mojo
- CarrKnight
- Carrsader
- Posts: 8,330
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: Trying to find the mojo
- Has liked: 8679 times
- High Fived: 3436 times
Maybe Mark left a blank check at Hooters?Jeevo wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:53 pm:This idea that Mark basically can't get the money is garbage. He owns a controlling share of a 2+ billion dollar asset and a wall of cash flow is coming at him soon. Bankers love shmoozing with sports celebs and the chance of default is zero.
-
r8rfox
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:13 pm
-
Jeevo
Posts: 4,152
Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Canada
Or P F Changs.CarrKnight wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 8:56 pm:Maybe Mark left a blank check at Hooters?
-
CarrKnight
Carrsader
Posts: 8,330
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
Location: Trying to find the mojo
- CarrKnight
- Carrsader
- Posts: 8,330
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:37 am
- Location: Trying to find the mojo
- Has liked: 8679 times
- High Fived: 3436 times
General Tso's for days.Jeevo wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:06 pm:Or P F Changs.
-
r8rfox
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:13 pm
I was thinking Buffalo Wild WingsCarrKnight wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:12 pm:General Tso's for days.
-
mad stork 83
Posts: 10,897
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:36 am
Location: On a message board bullying people by being polite to them
- mad stork 83
- Posts: 10,897
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:36 am
- Location: On a message board bullying people by being polite to them
- Has liked: 2210 times
- High Fived: 2822 times
I am liking the idea of a trade more and more. I think he will probably stay with his current contract but if he fails to report, time to see what we can get for him. Over the next 3 years, at his current contract, it makes sense to keep him. After that, the extra picks of a draft would be superior. I guess the question is whether or not we are in a position to make the Super Bowl the next 3 seasons. If not, it is probably best to trade him to make a later run. I am OK with either scenerio. I just hope we don't sign him to a long term deal. that would be the worst move and could be a disaster. JMO.Ivanavich wrote Mon Aug 13, 2018 1:28 am:via packerswire:
Bettors are making Mack to the Packers the highest likely bet.
Previous